Sunday, June 1, 2014

BOOKS by DANIEL ROBINSON and JOE SAFDIE

PATRICK JAMES DUNAGAN Reviews

Myself and Some Other Being: Wordsworth and the Life Writing by Daniel Robinson
(University of Iowa press, Iowa City, 2014)

and

Scholarship by Joe Safdie
Blazevox, Buffalo, 2014


William Wordsworth ranks in the upper echelon upon the slopes of Parnassus. He’s generally considered to have written, along with his pal Samuel Taylor Coleridge, one of the foundational texts of English Romanticism marking the shift towards Modernism, The Lyrical Ballads.  The Preface for which, recognized to be primarily the work of Wordsworth, calls for a poetry written in the language of the working class (Wordsworth referred to the working man) and concerning matters with which everyday regular individual readers would be able to identify. It often sounds as if Walt Whitman stepped directly out from its pages as a poet fit-to-order.

Joe Safdie teaches English at a small community college down around San Diego. A former student of poet Ed Dorn, he’s steeped in the lineage of American poetry that runs directly from English Romanticism to Whitman and Dickinson on up through the Modernism of Pound, W.C. Williams, and H.D. continued by Black Mountain College figures such as Olson, Creeley, and Duncan onwards to its various manifestations in locales such as Buffalo (Blakean Jack Clarke) and Bolinas (the ever present Joanne Kyger and likewise mainstay Duncan McNaughton).  Over the last forty years his poems have appeared in numerous small press publications, including several chapbooks, yet Scholarship is the first full collection of his work.

Daniel Robinson’s Myself and Some Other Being: Wordsworth and the Life Writing looks at the composition of Wordsworth’s autobiographical epic poem The Prelude which spanned his entire writing life, undergoing three significant manuscript stages and was only published after his death. Wordsworth completed the first, much shorter two part version of the work now known as The Prelude in 1798-99 beginning his initial work on it nearly immediately after Coleridge’s prompting, who urged in 1796 that, despite any substantial work as yet to demonstrate it, Wordsworth see himself as “the best poet of the age.” In 1805 he finished a much expanded thirteen book version of the previously abandoned work. Wordsworth’s The Excursion published in 1814 serves as a kind of alter after-the-fact reverse-ur-text accompanying the ongoing composition of the other poem. The Prelude conceivably introduces the early life experience of the hermit-poet presented in The Excursion. Throughout his later years Wordsworth repeatedly came back again and again to The Prelude and composed a final fourteen book version published in 1850.  

Robinson, a former student of poet James Dickey, utilizes his study of The Prelude to offer a supple biographical sketch diving into Wordsworth’s ambitions as a poet and his troubled relationship with Coleridge. He also takes the opportunity to discuss broader ramifications for the role of the poet as maker of the work of art, the interrelations between the poet’s life, his work, and his audience:

What the maker seeks to do is to find figures from his life that will correspond with similarly peculiar ones from his readers’ lives and then model for his readers what they can do with those figures, to produce creative fruits of their own and to repair imaginations that become impaired during the intercourse of everyday life.  

Safdie is a poet straddling the hump between the 20th and the 21st century confronting the same desire, and accompanying problems, as faced Wordsworth two hundred years before. Safdie’s “Watching Sports on TV” describes his struggle with writing the poem at hand, “trying to make autobiography / into epic, like Wordsworth” while simultaneously following a basketball game on television. Humor is rampant in Safdie’s often lengthy digressively discursive poems wherein he bandies about the weighty inheritance of poetic practice to which he’s albeit an unacknowledged heir. He’s commonly found to be running through comparisons between himself and poets of old, reconciling (or not) likes and dislikes.

           my first insight – I hate Virgil     
           because I’m too much like him,
channeling the heavens, surfing
the divine waves, seduced
by the Father God into thinking
there’s a plan instead of just
letting things flow, as Ovid did
                        (“Summer Reading (2011)”)

Safdie drafts his poems in clear dialogue not only with past poets, but also with readers he’s well aware do not as yet exist in any great number. Iowa is not knocking on his door offering him the next visiting poet slot. Not that he doesn't recognize his own lack of interest in attempting attain academic posts: “There was a job in Oregon I thought / I could get, but I forgot to apply / by the due date” (“Saturn Return (The Sequel)”) Yet similar to the Wordsworth who Robinson focuses upon—that is, the young, unproven Wordsworth who only has his own inhibited ambition and the backing of Coleridge to launch his grand poem The Prelude—Safdie embraces the larger questions of the act of writing itself in his work. Safdie proves himself the same sort of metaphysical thinking-through-the-writing poet Robinson describes Wordsworth of being.

Although he never became the philosophical poet that Coleridge wanted him to be, Wordsworth was interested in metaphysics. His thinking about such matters tends to focus on how they relate to identity and self. He comes up with a subjective metaphysics associated with poetics, with making, with creating – both poetry and identity. Wordsworth’s chief subject – even before Wordsworth himself – is the poem itself as a poem about the development of the writerly self.

Safdie is interested in this same exploration, pushing himself via his work to ask larger questions even as he understands that ultimately he’ll likely have to settle for accepting much less than the rewards of any sort of final summative answer: “What is poetry? I’ve been writing it for a long time and I have no idea.” (“Afterword: on Scholarship”) Despite the challenges not only of life but also the lackadaisical nature of the inspiration offered at times from the work itself, ways of courting poetry must be found.

later the Muse came less often
no longer hiding in the everyday
needing to be summoned by odd rituals
marijuana     jazz    the World Cup
                                                (“Tribute to Jack Clarke”)

Safdie demonstrates the same stamina Robinson allocates Wordsworth to the dedication of a life practice in poetry: “If there’s one thing that Wordsworth’s poetry shows, it’s that the writing of one’s life may sustain the life writing it by giving a sense of purpose, of being, of belonging – and of becoming.” It is the spirited zeal to reach beyond one’s own self, to be guided by the Outside in practices which develop the inside life. A set of principles Safdie discovers his own examples of as every poet must.

…poetry    which has to come from sources
outside the self   as Spicer also said
still, it makes sense
to think of Jack as Romantic
counseling concrete life
                        (“Tribute to Jack Clarke”)

As much as Robinson’s book is an introduction to Wordsworth’s work, life, and poetics it is also a meditation upon the working life of any poet practicing today. We’re all still Romantics, after all, even those who would deny the Muse in their work. (Safdie: “We’re all romantic / and all equally screwed.” (“Against Romanticism”))

When working through drafts of poems, even those destined for recognition and study, there’s no fame that accompanies being a poet. Wordsworth’s Prelude went overlooked his entire life for lack of readers due to his own inert impulse to publish it. Robinson remarks, “William Blake should have read The Prelude instead of The Excursion, which gave him a bowel complaint.” Of course, “like everybody else, he didn’t know it existed.”    

Robinson’s book relates an image of Wordsworth as the very practical-minded poet he no doubt brought himself into being as opposed to the rather socially lopsided, opium-addicted Coleridge. Safdie is somewhere between the two. While he maintains a steady source of income from teaching he’s no academic and not at all averse to recognizing the hazardous futility of the calling he’s willingly chosen. In the Poet Game, Safdie’s a lifer: Whatever the consequences he’s all in.

I want to meet William Blake.

Why not? When I was 21 I took acid
for the first time and he addressed me –
“Now that you’re here,” he said,
“what are you going to do about it?”
I didn’t know what to say,
much less what to do…
it’ll come to me or not,
before that chain rusts
(I’ve thrown away the key)
                                    (“What I want”)

That a poet such as Safdie goes overlooked in our day and age doesn't bode well for him or anybody else interested in poetry. I don't know whether Safdie has his own Prelude lurking in a drawer or with suspended status of "in contemplation" somewhere between his imagination and the page but given the range and depth found in Scholarship I wouldn't be at all surprised to discover he did. 

*****

Patrick James Dunagan lives in San Francisco and works at Gleeson library for the University of San Francisco. Many book reviews appear here and there. His most recent books are A GUSTONBOOK (Post Apollo 2011) and Das Gedichtete (Ugly Duckling 2013).




VERSES TYPHOON YOLANDA Edited by EILEEN R. TABIOS

AILEEN IBARDALOZA Engages

VERSES TYPHOON YOLANDA: A STORM OF FILIPINO POETS, Edited by Eileen R. Tabios
(Meritage Press, St. Helena & San Francisco, 2014)


NOTES ON VERSES TYPHOON YOLANDA

A requisite of the art and practice of poetry is the art and practice of being relevant. “If you would be a poet,” challenges Lawrence Ferlinghetti, “write living newspapers.” Such as Allen Ginsberg who “howled” against conformity and intolerance, thus breaking a barrier, and changing his generation with a poem. Or Jose Rizal who, on the eve of his execution, wrote verses that would be instrumental in giving Filipinos a Bill of Rights and the privilege of legislation; the same poem would be translated into more than 70 languages, and would serve as a battle hymn of Indonesian soldiers in their national struggle for independence.

Poets are inherent game-changers, the “unacknowledged legislators of the world,” according to Percy Bysshe Shelley. To practice poetry is to be freely, fiercely radical – form a community, inspire change, show compassion wherever and whenever it is needed. Verses Typhoon Yolanda is a call to action, where 133 Filipino poets came together to create a fundraising anthology. To emphasize the extent of Yolanda’s devastation, the Federation of American Scientists, in a report prepared for Congress, writes, “Super Typhoon Haiyan (Yolanda)… directly swept through six provinces in the Central Philippines… with a force equivalent to a category 5 hurricane and sustained winds of up to 195 mph… [As of January 2014,] UN agencies reported that 14.1 million people had been affected… with more than 4.1 million displaced… an estimated 6,201 had been killed and 1,785 [are still] missing… an estimated 1.1 million houses [had been] damaged or destroyed… and nearly 5.6 million [people] required food assistance… International donors contributed a total of $662.9 million to the relief efforts…”

Verses Typhoon Yolanda is a reportage invoking the language of the poets. It begins with a “Lament,” a prelude to profoundly moving instances of loss and the persistence of love:
     
You have become driftwood. / Only the sea knows the full story / of how you were battered and / shaped into death, limbs twisted… // I love you and the Universe / you once contained, which include / memories of the sea and its splendor… (Madriaga, 21)

The book flashes back to “The Night Before the Storm” with images and muted tones of foreboding:

They huddled inside their living room / And watched the news. They wondered / What signal number 4 will feel like… // And what is a “storm surge”? They / Heard that the sea will rise from the / Shore and extend its reach inland. (Cuales, 23)

And then follows a post-landfall narrative with unbroken verse lines so powerful and immediate they necessitate anger or action, or both:

We crowded the basement. There were bodies spilling out, we couldn’t all fit, and some took refuge in the scattered Jeepneys along the road, and when the trees and metal gates bent, so did they. // We walked ten miles to the airport after the winds fell and the storms bent metal gates and 10,000 went missing… We hear the military planes roaring above, bringing us more things to eat: we eat our hope… We walk, one leg lifting, one arm swaying, we walk, one breath inhaling, we walk. We walk with 10,000 bodies. We walk more than ten miles. We walk longer than eight hours. We walk till the metal gates unbend. Till the trees re-root. Till the coffins are filled. Till the houses are rebuilt. Till the roads are paved with our sweat. (Sipin, 26-28)

The world is warming. And like Yeb Sano, we are outraged by delaying climate action. “It is the fight of our lives – yet we can hardly bear to look at it,” Naomi Klein points out. In more solemn and mournful tones, the following quatrains express both umbrage and remorse:

Men endure the world both tropical and bipolar. / Water, true ruler of our lives, / awaits coronation by the public / that still sings paeans to oil. // The wind stabs through the cracks, / the smell always smoky, a charnel / house of the dead and the hungry. / The soil bone dry, the cities // And their sirens remind us / of the appointments we set, / and the graves we dug for ourselves / a long time ago. (Francia, 54)

The indignation spreads across boundaries and generations, demanding both perception and action:

because music more than my english words can cross borders / and move a giving nation, because my words ironize sympathy, / solidarity, because, my poems are infected with corruption, / about deforestation… / The danger is, words can romance what I have never seen–only in postcards and travel catalogs, but my family calls the archipelago home. (Manzano, 75)

“Poetry [is] a way to survive,” says Meena Alexander, “In a time of [tragedy], the task of poetry is in some way to reconcile us to our world and allow us a measure of tenderness and grace.” Verses Typhoon Yolanda, even as it recounts, sifts, and thunders (at) the larger issues, offers vignettes of life that restore, gently hopeful and forgiving:

raise the line high, to catch the wind, sun, sky, our clothes / bellied out, bleached white, drops darkening the sand, / vanishing into air, turning into clouds, falling as the rain / that lashed my grandmother’s house one night as a typhoon / blew through. Downstairs filled with neighbours, / sleeping on the concrete floor. Outside, the rain became needles, / pinning the night through and through. When we woke, / the sun was out, the water dried up. I wound my watch, / brought it up to my ear to hear it tick. (Alvarez, 126)

Mostly in monsoon weather / There is that rush for umbrellas, / Colored dots seen from the sky / As the scurrying of shiny ants. / From the slick wet streets / The doorways glimmer with light / Veiled by haze of downpour, / Welcoming, beckoning, opening up / For those who would come home. (Anonas-Carpio, 160)

i wanna write a song for my people / a love song / soothing / blunt edge / and / sorrow / on / lonely nights / home from factories / song / stitched / mountain to field / all us folk / chanting / this song / psalm / a poem of love / united / this moment / breath / rhythm solid / breath / once again / unity / in poem / a song of love / for my people (Sevilla, 185)

Ultimately, Verses Typhoon Yolanda is about community – building one in order to rebuild another. It is this, our sense of Kapwa, that moves us to

look out  for each other (Skyline College’s Fall 2013 PCN Class, 205)

Help to change the world, and make it blossom. (Fernandez, 202)

most of all make the story heard. (Caranto, 199)


++++

VERSES TYPHOON YOLANDA can be ordered HERE; all profits will be donated to relief organizations helping survivors of Typhoon Haiyan.


*****


Aileen Ibardaloza is the author of Traje de Boda (Meritage Press, 2010) and the Associate Editor of Our Own Voice Literary Ezine.





READING THE UNSEEN (OFFSTAGE) HAMLET by STEPHEN RATCLIFFE

T.C. MARSHALL Reviews

Reading the Unseen (Offstage) Hamlet by Stephen Ratcliffe
(Counterpath Press, Denver, CO, 2010)

Hearsay or See: Ratcliffe’s Questioning Shakespeare

On page 3 of this book, we get to wrestle with Gertrude Stein’s minimized punctuation to get an important idea: “does as the scene in the theater proceeds does the hearing take the place of seeing as perhaps it does when something real is being most exciting, or does seeing take the place of hearing as perhaps it does when anything real is happening or does the mixture get to be more mixed seeing and hearing as perhaps it does when anything really exciting is really happening.” Though he makes copious use in his notes of great literary scholars like Harry Berger or Stephen Greenblatt, Stephen Ratcliffe briefly and effectively uses Stein’s lecture on “Plays” to focus on his point in Reading the Unseen. This book is a close reading, a very close reading, of several key speeches in Shakespeare’s Hamlet. It focuses on words and the work they do to show actions and images that are not seen on stage but are important to the play and its story. Ratcliffe’s repeated contention is that these are not just ways of forwarding the plot or giving depth to characters but “in effect Shakespeare’s way in Hamlet of calling into question how it is that we know what we know” (62).

In looking at what we hear in Queen Gertrude’s speech about Ophelia’s drowning, for instance, Ratcliffe raises the question of how the Queen knows the things she says. This echoes and accentuates our own dilemma in the audience as we take the Queen’s word for what happened, and may hear in it many things that might either accuse or excuse Ophelia. Her accident or suicide is perhaps undecidably both and all we know about it for sure is that we heard about it in Queen Gertrude’s words. The way we picture it to ourselves from those words is part of Ratcliffe’s focus. He reminds us to look again at how we almost tend to think we have seen it because we can picture it. As his preface puts it, “those scenes work to make physically absent things imaginatively ‘present’” (xi).

Ratcliffe’s thinking in this book works with “the materialities both of language and of physical action performed on a stage” in the “seamlessness” of the play, and with how the meanings of either may be “multiple or unclear” (xii). This is poets’ stuff. Ratcliffe permits himself the readerly focus that he says Shakespeare’s writing usually does not get from us in the quick pace of a stage performance, but he is also implying that even then we are affected by what the words themselves perform (xiii). He slows down this effect and works to help us see more of what the words perform and how they do it, sound by sound and meaning by meaning or nuance by nuance.

Those of us who practice poetry as writers or readers or both will benefit from Ratcliffe’s approach. His approach to his own poetry these days seems very much caught up in related questions. Counterpath has also published Selected Days (2012). Recalling Whitman’s Specimen Days of Civil War times in its title and presentations of observed images, that book collects selections from six day-book works Ratcliffe has written in recent years. At the heart of each of them is the faith that the reader can and will build images from the words and take them as specimens of what the writer has observed. Specimen, evidence, testimony, observation, all are in play here. In the play Hamlet, Ratcliffe shows us, Shakespeare worked to use this sensibility by going inside it. He went even further than Ratcliffe’s own poems do by using the device of plot to frame the undecidable nature of testimony. This nature is located in us, in our hearing, in the “ear” and the “mind’s eye.” “Hear-say” is used both to help the audience to get all the pieces of a story too difficult to stage in all its parts, and to help the audience to question the nature of knowing.

What’s interesting about following Ratcliffe into this split is that it reveals the nature of theater as poetry. The old narrative bardic function of poetry is probably the root of theater after all, along with the ritual re-enactment of the hunt and other stories. These depend on a story that is already somewhat known by the audience being re-created by narrators who tell what we trust them to know. As Robin Blaser used to say narr = gna = know, and his etymologies were usually trustworthy. What Ratcliffe wants us to notice and focus upon in his close reading is how we picture to ourselves what we hear, and then we tend to believe it. He even goes to the level of sound play, where the “sound effects” of speeches like Queen Gertrude’s “simply happen too quickly and too constantly for us to notice that they are happening.” His reading links those effects to the way we “see” what we are told but not shown, and he says that “:is why they are so aesthetically effective” (66). He works toward the point that what happens in words has its own location apart from “the world” (68).

Ratcliffe’s suggestion that the playwright “could have chosen to show that scene” in the world onstage seems to bring in a modern sensibility from film or video (76). This weakens the point even as it helps to make it; such an enactment is not a likely subject for the stage of Shakespeare’s day and would deny the history of the audience’s imaginative place in theater and poetry. We enter the play’s themes of “uncertainty, ambiguity, and the unknowableness of death” through our part in their indirect representation by words (76), just as we have done through the millennia of poetry’s presentations.

Ratcliffe’s book investigates several other speeches from Hamlet along with Gertrude’s. He does this job very ably through looking closely at “the verbal action in  the speech” and “the physical action described by it” (77). The scenes presented all are ones unlikely for representation on the boards at the Globe (though Tom Stoppard took a crack at Hamlet’s voyage in Rosencrantz and Guildenstern). Reading the Unseen’s poetic emphasis on “how words work to enact a world whose meaning cannot be seen or heard” in any direct simple way brings its well-wrought weight to bear on “a world whose performance in theater becomes” (in Hamlet’s own words) “what thinking makes … so” (2.2.250).

It is our thinking that is emphasized here; in modern terms, Hamlet is “interactive.” In age-old terms, it operates by audience participation in everything from sexual innuendo to intrigue and on to imaginatively supplying scenes that are not likely for staging. Ratcliffe’s point that “we are never going to know for sure what exactly ‘happened’” in these scenes is well argued and should be well taken. Still, it seems to discount our part and our tendency to play it. We do imagine and thereby know; we are never entirely “left in the dark” We who do enjoy plays like this do “keep coming back to it, wanting more” (103), but what we want is more opportunity to play our part and have our hours upon the stage of our own engaged minds in more than the strutting and fretting of “a poor player” (MacBeth 5.5.24-25). This focus seems to be missed by Ratcliffe’s closing “Afterword.” There he focuses on Shakespeare and all the mystery about who he was and what he meant.

The sharper contribution of this book is in a sentence halfway through: “What is not shown physically cannot ever be known, yet (mysteriously) is wholly imaginable once it enters opur ears” (55). That is the great mystery, and Stephen Ratcliffe has done a great job of showing us the minute ins and outs of it in Hamlet as a play for audiences and readers. The play, and Ratcliffe’s very engaging recent poetry,“ invite us to ‘see’ things with our ears because we cannot see them with our eyes.” These are  the substance of our root role as audience because they are “things we can therefore only speculate about from the words used to ‘perform’ them—words that are in interaction with one another themselves like actors in a text (Hamlet) that itself is to the theater as theater is to that text” (51). To focus on the many things that do not “happen except in words” (43) is to return the theater to its poetry. Ratcliffe returns us to that in this brief and lively book.

*****

T.C. Marshall has been publishing poems, critical work, and literary theory ever since his “Skyscraper” was selected for a mimeographed poetry anthology when he was in first grade. Recently, he has gone beyond paper into publishing blogbooks. One is called "Post Language" becuase it is composed of poems that incorporate picture that were all posted first on FaceBook as interventions in the photo-sharing expectations there. Tom has also begun Maize Poem, a blogged composition in progress that displays the evolution of his self-education about corn. Another focuses on education and is called "Mister Ed." They all can be found on blogspot along with other thoughts of his and ones he has borrowed from his teachers. He himself has enjoyed teaching for over twenty years in the community and at Cabrillo Community College in Santa Cruz County, California.